Business enviornment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Business enviornment - Essay Example The counter for the Planned Economy is the Mixed Economy. The Mixed Economy has provided an opportunity to the private stake-holders to invest and contribute in the economic development of the country. The balance of power and equilibrium is maintained between the private and public stake-holders. The economic policies formulated are implemented only after the incorporation of the recommendations of the private stake-holders. The production capacity of the private sector is non-conditional, and the private companies have the right to avail any business opportunity locally and internationally. The contribution of the private sector is therefore tremendous under the concept of mixed economy. The mixed economy offers freedom to private- sector produce and expands as per their plans; however this is strongly discouraged under the concept of planned economy. The overall economic performance of the country is assisted by the contribution of the public and private sector, and it is importan t for the government to take lead and monitor the business plans of these sectors. The private sector is basically interest-driven sector, and many significant and critical factors of the country's economy are ignored by the private-sector while defining their economic targets and production plans.

Battle of Gettysburg Essay -- essays research papers fc

The Battle of Gettysburg   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The Battle of Gettysburg was the most decisive battle for the North, and it lasted for a total of three days. It began on July 1 and ended on July 3, 1863. The Confederacy was going on the offensive and was beginning to venture into Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Washington D.C. They encountered Union troops as they advanced towards Harrisburg where they planned to cut off Union supply lines and to steal provisions that they needed. The Battle of Gettysburg became the bloodiest multi-day battle ever fought in United States history. At the end of the Battle of Gettysburg, the Union claimed victory, and they would use this psychological advantage throughout the rest of the Civil War.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  On the first day of battle, the Confederate Cavalry attacked a Union Cavalry division that the Confederates greatly outnumbered. The Union Cavalry was able to hold the Confederates off and actually drive them back until the late afternoon. When Confederate reinforcements arrived, they helped to overpower the Union soldiers and force them to retreat. The Union army then attempted to regroup on Cemetery Hill where they were joined by the bulk of General Meade’s Union army.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  On July 2, the second day of fighting began. The day began with Lee ordering an attack on the Union flanks in hopes of surrounding them. The Union held strong on the right flank, but on the left, the Confederates were a...

Interpersonal deception theory Essay

The interpersonal deception theory’s presence throughout Martin Scorsese’s film, The Departed, is made abundantly clear through the interactions between the characters. Two of the main characters, Agent Sullivan and William, both lie in order to do their jobs, and to just survive. These characters exhibit the three dominant deception theories – falsification, concealment, and equivocation, as well as utilizing eye contact, either purposely or not. The interpersonal deception theory attempts to explain the manner in which two people who are engaged in face-to-face communication deal with deception. It is possible to detect deception from verbal and nonverbal cues. There are three dominant deception theories – falsification, concealment, and equivocation. Falsification is when one individual, the â€Å"sender†, blatantly lies to another individual, the â€Å"receiver. † Concealment is when the sender omits certain facts; this results in deception. Equivocation is when the sender skirts the issues by changing the subject (Hearn 2006). In Martin Scorsese’s film The Departed, William, the undercover officer working with Frank Costello, and Agent Sullivan, the detective who is helping Frank Costello, both exhibit dominant deception theories. Both lie throughout the entire film; William is a good guy pretending to be bad, while Agent Sullivan is a bad guy pretending to be good. Both are fairly good at lying, however, there are small, somewhat tell-tale signs that they are being deceptive. Agent Sullivan is a detective with the Massachusetts State Police. When he was a boy, a local criminal, Frank Costello, helped him out, and the two had been friends ever since. When Sullivan became a detective on a case where the police were trying to capture Costello, Sullivan did everything he could to help Costello. Because of his two-faced nature, he had to lie to his girlfriend, Madolyn, and the men he worked with, including his boss. Agent Sullivan worked his deception on those around him in two obvious ways – concealment and equivocation. The first example is of equivocation. About half way through the film, Sullivan got a phone call from Costello, and Madolyn answered the phone. When Sullivan got off the phone, Madolyn asked him who had called him. Sullivan told her that it was his boss. She knew he was lying to her, so he skirted the issue by saying that there are things about his job that he could not tell her, things that she did not even want to know. He even tried to make a joke about her questions interfering with an ongoing investigation. He successfully got her mind off of the actual issue at hand, the issue of the mysterious caller. The example of concealment is demonstrated throughout the film in regards to Agent Sullivan. Sullivan spends the entire film trying not to be found out as the man Costello has in the police department. When things start to really unravel, Sullivan is assigned to find the leak in the department, and he actually takes on the task. From here on out, Sullivan works hard to continue to conceal his true identity. William was working for the Massachusetts State Police as an undercover cop. He did not successfully complete the training at the Police Academy, but he wanted to be a cop. No one knew he was working for the police department except for two high-ranking officers. William became a trusted friend of Frank Costello while investigating him. This gave William the edge he needed to capture Costello, but deceiving Costello could have proved to be deadly. William worked his deception on Costello in two ways – falsification and concealment. In a scene where Costello wanted to talk to William about a â€Å"rat† in the operation, William flat-out lied to him, telling Costello that he was not the rat. William knew that Costello suspected him of being the rat, but William kept denying it. Costello began to believe him. William successfully lied his way out of a potentially deadly situation. William also used the trick of concealment to his advantage. He, first and foremost, concealed his identity, not only from Costello and his gang, but also from other officers in the police department. No one in the police department knew that he was working undercover. Because he did not graduate from the Police Academy, William was not a real police officer. Because of this, he went virtually undetected. William’s concealment of his true identity was successful, until Costello wanted his real name, social security number, and bank account numbers. It was then that William knew he had to find a way out. From here on out, things began to fall apart. Both Agent Sullivan’s and William’s deception could have been detected. Most individuals believe that they can tell when a person is lying to them. They can detect deception by listening and watching the sender. Signs such as eye contact/rapid eye movement, body rigidity, and fidgeting can be tell-tale signs of when an individual is trying to deceive another individual. Eye contact is held as the number one indicator of truth or deception. Most believe that if an individual holds strong eye contact, then that person is being truthful. On the other hand, if one’s eyes move rapidly, or one cannot look another in the eye while talking to them, it is an indication of deception. Law enforcement interviewers and interrogators believe that when a person is not being truthful, they will break eye contact and either look to the right or to the left. This belief, however, is not substantiated (Walters 2000). Although proven an unreliable means of detecting deception, this does not stop Scorsese from implementing this strategy when it comes to Agent Sullivan’s behavior. Agent Sullivan’s behavior, if paid attention to, would have alerted anyone to his deception. For example, Sullivan never made complete eye contact while lying. He does make good eye contact when he says that Costello has a man in the police department, because that information is true. However, when he says that he is working on finding out who it is, he looks briefly at the floor. Sullivan breaks eye contact, an indication that he is lying. In actuality, Sullivan himself is the man Costello has in the police department, so Sullivan has no intention of finding out who the rat is. Another example of Agent Sullivan’s odd behavior is at the sting. Sullivan calls Costello to inform him that he is being watched by the police. Later, Sullivan finds out that the FBI is present and is monitoring cellular phone activity. Sullivan begins to sneak nervous glances around the room, looking to see if anyone has detected his involvement with Costello. In the scene where William meets Costello for a discussion on who the â€Å"rat† is, William makes deliberate, strong eye contact. Unlike Agent Sullivan, when William lies to Costello, William looks him straight in the eye and does not waiver. William is nervous about meeting with Costello, but he carries himself as though he is in control of the situation. Although William was nervous, he does not back down from Costello. This forces Costello to back down and to take William’s word that he is not the rat at face value. It is generally believed that when someone breaks eye contact with the person they are talking to, they could be lying. However, when someone makes deliberate eye contact, that could mean that they are trying to conceal the fact that they are indeed lying. Deliberate eye contact also means that the person maintaining strong eye contact is trying to maintain dominance or control over the person he is speaking with. This is done is such a way that the receiver would not even think about questioning the accuracy of the sender’s words (Walters 2000). This is how William wins over Costello. The term â€Å"leakage† is used to refer to any behavior outside of a deceiver’s conscious controls that could signal dishonesty. These signals could include the formerly mentioned body rigidity and fidgeting (Schneider 2007). For example, when Agent Sullivan is at the sting, after he found out that the FBI were monitoring cellular phone activity, he sits very still, only moving his head to glance around the room. His body seems to become very rigid, perched uncomfortably on a table. He also seems to be fidgeting inside his coat pocket. In actuality, however, he is sending a text message to Costello that says, â€Å"no phones. † Sullivan could have â€Å"leaked† his involvement with Costello if someone had been paying attention. The characters of Agent Sullivan and William exhibit falsification, concealment, and equivocation. The use of eye contact, both deliberate and not, make the characters more human. All of the signs of dishonesty that these two characters exhibited made the viewer believe that those characters were real. Both characters’ deceptions could have been seen through, like most people’s deceptions, but they were not detected. They carried their burdens well, working their hardest to not only do their jobs, but to survive.

Maximillien Robespierre Essay - 1722 Words

Maximillien Robespierre Maximillien Robespierre is commonly viewed as the symbol of the Reign of Terror, the short period in which thousands of people were executed because they were thought to be traitors. However, Maximillien was actually an idealistic reformer with an image of peace and equality driving him on, who is unfairly credited with the Terror, and assumed to be a power-hungry tyrant. Maximillien was able to attend a prominent educational institution. He became an intelligent person and pursued a career in law. His practice exposed him to an interest in humanity and the abused rights of many people (Hanson 32). Maximillien was opposed to violence. While a judge, he condemned a murderer and, according to his†¦show more content†¦Robespierre was honestly working for the good of the people. He once stopped 75 Girondins from being tried for signing a secret protest against their leaders’ arrests, knowing they would be executed (Hampson 139). Much of the public understood and loved Robespierre. When he was finally arrested, the prison guard refused to hold him (Gaxotte 223). Instead of fleeing, he returned to Paris where a crowd of his followers congregated. He absolutely forbid them to fight for him, as they were planning (Geib). His altruistic efforts suggest some outside force caused the change in his allowing of the more brutal manner of reform ation, later, when the many thousands of people were executed. Jean-Jacques Rousseau may have influenced Robespierre with his strong nationalist views, being an important, and influential role-model for Robespierre. It is said that Robespierre slept with a copy of Rousseau’s Social Contract next to him (Halsall). Rousseau thought that it was the greatest of all sins to continue in life when one believes there is a better way (Searle). Robespierre knew there was another way; a republic, free of the uncaring rule of powerful monarchs. This idea may have encouraged Robespierre to press for reformation at all costs. Robespierre was also influenced by the Committee of Public Safety, which he was a part of. The other nationalists within the Committee may have pressured himShow MoreRelatedRole of Political Clubs on Frnech Revolution1664 Words   |  7 PagesMaximilien Robespierre and a member of the Committee of Public Safety) and Joseph Fouchà © (who would later become Napoleons Minister of Police). However The most prominent figure of this club has to be Maximillien Robespierre- the leader and founder of the club, and the man responsible behind the reign of terror. As soon as the Jacobins dominated the political scene with the backing of the Paris Mob and commune the so called reign of terror begun (more bellow). The fall of Robespierre meant the fallRead MoreFrench Revolution and Nationalism1411 Words   |  6 Pagesmovement. From the Declaration came the Reign of Terror, led by the National Convention. Enlightenment thought and the idea of equal rights were warped and mislead during t he Terror. After the execution of one of the Convention’s main leaders, Maximillien Robespierre, France entered into a period of well-needed recovery and regrouping. This period of recovery was led by the French Directory. Though not often credited, the Directory was essential for Napoleon Bonaparte to take over as the first Consul ofRead MoreThe French Revolution : The Most Momentous Upheaval Of The Revolutionary Age That Replaced Modern Society2335 Words   |  10 Pagesup a workable constitutional monarchy under Louis XVI may further explain why Robespierre becomes an advocate of terror. Born in 1758 Maximillien Robespierre, from Arras, was one of the most famous radicals that were able to gasp power in France. He dealt with numerous tragedies throughout his early life. He lost his mother when he was six years of age and his father abandoned his family shortly after that. Maximillien, the eldest of three other siblings, succeeded at anything he put his mind toRead MoreNap oleon Bonaparte Essay1537 Words   |  7 Pagescalled Supper at Beaucaire (Moore 6). This book got the attention of Augustin Robespierre, who really loved the book and was a big admirer of Napoleon. He was the younger brother of Maximillien Robespierre, the revolutionary and political leader. These brothers like Napoleon but they only started trouble for him. From meeting these brothers Napoleon’s military career started to take a turn for the worse. When the Robespierre brothers lost all their power as the leaders of the French Revolt NapoleonRead MoreTaking a Look at the French Revolution593 Words   |  2 Pagestime before the majority of France’s population has tolerated enough of the king’s unjust actions and revolts. As an advocate of the Third Estate, leader of the Jacobin Club, and as an active person in the Committee of Public Safety, I, Maximillien Robespierre, shall not tolerate this abuse any longer. The corruption in France has reached its peak and all is due to the decisions of an unjust king. Had Louis XVI not chosen an unqualified minister to accurately report to him the financial status ofRead MoreThe Radical Ideology Of Early Liberalism1393 Words   |  6 Pagespolitical thinkers, known as the Jacobins, were some of the most revolutionary thinkers of the French Revolution. They began modestly, working for equality under the law, and other general liberal ideologies. Then, following the leadership of Maximillien de Robespierre, the Jacobins became a source of terror for France. Killing those who favored the King, and encouraging families to turn on one another for the sake of public execution. As the Jacobins inverse, the Feillants were a group of people whomRead MoreRousseau s Influence On Politics And Literature1991 Words   |  8 Pagesruled themselves hence his idea of freedom being ‘ruling oneself- that is living under a law that was created and enacted from the beginning by oneself.’ This idea impacted on people both positively and negatively, with other works such as Maximillien Robespierre coming up to contradict his work with ideas such as citizens having the rights to repel their civilization so as to fit his individual purposes, however did not push through the ‘Reign of terror’ with Rousseau aggressively supporting thatRead MoreThe impact of the French Revolution on Ballet2183 Words   |  9 PagesFrance was a violent, bitter and scary time to live in. These ballets sought to create an outlet for the people that would help them to identify good and evil, and the outcomes of the two. With the creation of the Committee of Public Safety by Robespierre in 1793, the revolutionary spirit became more controlled and violent. While the ideas of â€Å"Libertà ©, à ©galità ©, fraternità ©Ã¢â‚¬  were still supreme, any deviance from those ideals would lead to death. As such, plays and spoken word theaters were stifled