Nature and Human

NATURE AND HUMAN Nature and human present unceasingly interacted through show up history, and the interaction of the two forces has evolved into a series of demands that people have put on nature to survive and develop. By contrast a minority of people have questi mavend the state of things and tried to figure out how humanity and nature screwing interact and develop together, and through their questioning they have pick out to define their idea as ecological cosmology. To catch with it is important to always start from the word itself, as each and every(prenominal) word has a meaning firstly by itself, and then it bear acquire more than depth through its use in a given context.Ecological cosmology comes from the Greek oikos and logos , these two words define on an individual basis a dwelling place and a discourse or intelligible manifestation. Ecological is something that deals with the environs in which one is, and on what can be said of that milieu. cosmogeny is instead related to kosmos or order and its intelligible manifestation, thus it can be said that there is an intelligible order or a logic to how things go past.Ecological cosmology can be absorbn as the order in which things happen in a given environment, and some(prenominal) versions of it exist, as many people with different backgrounds thought of defining the order of things depending on how themselves and their environment are shaped or are going to be shaped. The fab process deals not but with natural objects, but with the notional potencies whose veritable product is consciousness itself. So it is here that our expl anation breaks through into objectivity and becomes tot tout ensembley objective (Shelling, 207). Ecological cosmology has been enamourn as a apologueological force, of creative and positive nature, which comes to define elements of nature, and the perceptiveness of them that people come to have. Talking most nature and ecological cosmology becomes as a result government agency of a discourse that does not limit itself on discussing how a myth can come to be seen in nature, but in like manner on the fact that a myth becomes an object that people can see in nature and attribute a representation to it that can be viewed on how people see and define elements and objects within nature and how these objects happen to effect the relationship of mankind and nature. It is worth noting that no moral source ever got very far that could not speak to religious conviction, conscription on the deeper sensibilities that guide public opinion even in our more secular era (Scully, pp. 12-13). Throughout the evolution of mankind, people have done for(p) through different phases of ecological cosmology and at one agitate or another ecological cosmology happened to be tied in with Christian regulations to be viewed as something more approachable as a way of being within nature, rather than the sole use of nature.For illustrate at one moment or the o ther nature has been perceive as an element of Gods creations, in which people were to live abiding the regulation of God, and using nature to further mans position on earth. It is interesting to see in fact how the evolution of Christianity has put people first as representation of Gods will on Earth and then later onward only at a second time, people have seen nature as something to deprivationy of care.Interestingly enough nature has been for most part of humanitys history the sponsor in a relationship care towards it instead has always come at a second time and out of the feeling of wrong rather than respect in a balanced environment, as merely humanity and people have seen balance in the goods generated by nature.It is also worth noting that in times when nature got assist it has been mostly the attention of an intellectual elite, and even in cultural movement such as romanticism attention to nature and its care have only been regarded as a pastime, like for example when in the late 1800s the British senior high school society started to find interest in gardening and even that has been solely related to an elite status.Intellectuals and elites have been able to move society onward within limits, but sadly those limits havent been altered too much or challenged even within those circles. Results have been many compared to a level of ripening that mankind has obtained out of the use of the many fruits of mother nature, it is interesting to pull down out that those phases of interest in nature have been mostly occurring after intense industrial developments periods and because of that they have become the hadow after the light of successes of perception and scientific research. Yet those phases have brought onto people the harsh reality and of necessity that follow advancements as those have a price, and results that not only require increasing social conditions, but also that affect people with intriguing bad health conditions and a stat e of realization to people that at any of hose junctions empathise the damages in natures ecosystems.Furthermore it is interesting to realize how Renaissance, Enlightenment, Romanticism, Impressionism and Expressionism have challenged the status quo on a cultural level. All those cultural, elegant and elitist movements have allowed men to have a reality check with its present-day(a) community, and given they all developed a specific code in any given location in which they took place.They have started a ceaseless discourse that has led people to ones realization nature and humanity need to re-balance one another and the balance to be found is not as easy to come by as it is expected even after constant technical development in both industrial and artisanal methods, the mooring people are put in front of holds many challenges, and the biggest one of them involves a change in understanding and dealing with nature all together. erably failed. But he was a humble seeker of Truth. He was a man with exceptional sincerity, honesty and truthfulness. For him, understanding meant action. Once any principle appealed to him, he immediately began to translate that in practice. He did not crawl from taking risks and did not mind confessing mistakes. No opposition, scorn or